Saturday, June 9, 2012

ASoNAudiophiles - May 2012


ASoN Meeting – May 6, 2012

Acoustic 3D – 3 dimensional acoustic hologram speakers

Introduction:

 At the May meeting, we got an early look at radical new loudspeakers from Australian company Acoustic 3D. Although when I say “new”, they have been over 20 years in development, and incorporate innovative thinking and application of a field of mathematics known as fractals. Think chaos theory, clouds, snowflakes, and the famous Mandelbrot set. (I’ll leave it to interested readers to google.)

These speakers promise to virtually eliminate the effects of listening room acoustics, including echo – previously considered difficult if not impossible.  The goal is to “make every spot a sweet spot” i.e. all listeners should hear the same thing, regardless of location, and of course, to provide an accurate 3 dimensional image.

Inventor, mathematician and acoustician Joe Hayes, together with esteemed loudspeaker designer Brad Serhan, presented a small speaker system, currently on sale, known as the Emergence 2.1,  and an early prototype of a larger speaker known as the 7 2 or 7 squared.

The first speakers are based on fractal dispersion algorithm lenses which create a 3D sonic field. This lens, which sits above the upward-facing driver, at about 45 degrees, looks like a series of channels or slots machined into a short length of aluminium or plastic (presumably), and acts to disperse the sound waves in accordance with the mathematical theory stated above.

The latter speakers use an array of 49 x 2” drivers arranged in a square, hence the name. They also have a tweeter array of 49 dome tweeters similarly arranged, although being a prototype these were not yet fitted. Seven channels of amplification and digital signal processing are used to create the required sound field, again according to the above theory, as well as allowing the sound to be tailored and compensate to an extent for some of the driver limitations.



Equipment:

As the Emergence 2.1 are not designed for a room as large as the main listening room, these were set up in the foyer.

Closing my eyes, I could imagine a much larger loudspeaker, and the sound did indeed fill the room, with impressive image size and surprising depth.

In the main room, we had the 7 2’s with source from a computer.

Brad was using feedback from listeners to tune the DSP (digital signal processors) in the 7 2’s, and made considerable improvements in a surprising short time – aah! the power of DSP!

The overall opinion was that these speakers sounded “ a bit PA (public address) “, and in my words “lacked the finesse of what audiophiles are used to”. But it must be remembered that these were prototypes, and did not have the tweeters fitted, so the midrange/woofers had a difficult job to do.

Some felt this was due to the use of DSP and Class-D (switching) amplifiers, but I doubt it. Despite popular opinion (not based on fact) to the contrary, some class-D amplifiers in my experience, sound amazingly clean and detailed. They don’t suffer from crossover distortion, for starters, although they do have to overcome other issues.


Conclusion:

While there are some loudspeakers in commercial use using arrays and DSP to “steer” the sound without having to physically move the loudspeaker, Acoustic 3D are taking the technology to new heights, and attempting to accomplish much more: the removal of the listening room!


(Steering is accomplished by applying a time delay to various drivers – this has the same effect as moving them. For example, as sound travels at 345 metres per second, if we delay the sound by one thousandth of a second in the DSP, it’s as if we moved that speaker back by 345mm.

This idea was originally used with radar antenna arrays in the 1940’s! Although then they were dealing with radio waves travelling at the speed of light, so an extra metre of antenna feed cable had the same effect as moving the antenna a metre (approx).)


The Emergence 2.1, which use a sound lens rather than DSP, is especially ingenious – and effective.


I believe that these speakers are just the forerunners of some very exciting things to come, using DSP, and that they help cement the place of DSP in high end audio.


Watch this space !!!


Many thanks to Joe Hayes and Brad Serhan for a most interesting and exciting session.


















Saturday, May 12, 2012

ASoNAudiophiles - March 2012


<h2>ASoN Meeting - March 2012</h2>


Introduction:

I was really looking forward to this one, as I had heard a system comprising equipment from Acoustic Zen Technologies, Rogue Audio, and North Star Design a while ago, and rated it most highly.

This system was a step above in terms of the specific models.

Equipment:

Speakers: Acoustic Zen Technologies – 3 way – horn loaded ribbon tweeter, 2 x midrange with underhung voicecall in MTM (D’Appolito) configuration; 2 x base drivers in transmission line.

Amplification: Rogue Audio (tube) M180 Monoblocks featuring KT90 output tubes in ultralinear or triode mode; Athena reference preamp.

Unusually, you can switch modes “on the fly” – no need to power down.

Source: North Star Design USB-DAC32 “32 bit” DAC, sourced from laptop and M192 CD transport with I2S interconnect (rather than SPDIF).

Cables: Acoustic Zen Technologies and HDiamond

DAC to preamp - silver; remaining copper; power cables – regular economy IEC


Playlist and Impressions:


( I was seated front row centre.)

Ultralinear mode; CD transport

1) Carol Kidd – Dreamsville

The double bass and Carol’s voice were very detailed and natural – realistic and convincing; there was a touch of midrange “glare” when other instruments came in. As usual “blame it on the room”.

2) Orchestral – brass intro.

Clean, fast bass extension; brass had the right amount of “bite” without becoming harsh

3) Alan Taylor – Old Friends, New Roads

Good clarity; guitar perhaps more convincing than the voice

4) Antiphone Blues – Arne, Domnerus

Sax and pipe organ – lots of reverb in the recording, difficult to judge

5) Jennifer Warnes – Bird on a Wire

Good example of the speaker’s “speed”. I don’t really like that term, but transients were very clean and this track highlighted the low distortion of underhung voice coils and transmission line bass loading

6) Scheherezade – London Philharmonic Orchestra – Jose Serebrier

Here we switched between ultralinear and triode modes.

The solo violin was very clear. Triode mode sounded warmer, and by comparison, ultralinear now sounded a bit lean and clinical (but by no means “bad”).
Ultralinear seemed to give greater clarity to the strings of stringed instruments; triode gave a greater sense of the actual body of the instrument i.e. more depth, weight.

From here on, the vote was to stay with triode mode.

7) Allen Smith Quartet – Estate – Live jazz recording featuring trumpet and piano

Piano was realistic, with great presence and the right sense of size.
Trumpet was also realistic and “there”.

8) Naim demo disc – Thea Gilmore – rock

Awful recording, sounding very “cluttered”. Difficult to separate vocals, instruments.

9) Pink Panther Theme

Great detail, resolution, dynamics. Lovely percussive attack on Hammond organ.

One of the best tracks so far.

10) African – male voices

Good ability to distinguish and separate the voices.


After the break, we changed source to high resolution internet downloads on PC.

11) Jazz trio – featuring piano.

Natural, drums very dynamic and detailed, perhaps a touch of ringing on the piano at times, soundstage a bit “dual mono” at times.

12) Female vocal, baritone sax, drums

Very realistic, one of the best tracks.

13) Ray Charles and Norah Jones – “One More Time”   -  24 bit, 88.2 KHz

Despite having a few of her albums, the fact that she is usually well recorded, and listening to her frequently, I did not initially recognize her voice. Sound was all body, no tops.

14) Christy Baron – “Happy Together” – FLAC 24 bit 96 KHz

Nothing to criticize.

15) Diana Krall – piano trio, no vocal

Piano at time sounded “congested”, top notes edgy and hard; percussion very detailed; bottom end extended and powerful

16) Eva Cassidy

Again, top piano notes a bit “hard”, “brittle”.  Again, may be the room.


Conclusion:

In re-reading my notes, it occurs to me that I may be being overly critical. The reason is simply that is a great system, and equipment that I have heard before and therefore I had VERY high expectations.

The issues with ringing and harshness are likely to be due to the room acoustics. For example, when I heard the club’s KEF Q900 speakers here (and Haberfield was even worse!) they sounded way too bright, and seemed to ring to the extent that there could have been a tweeter fault. However, when I got them home, none of this was evident – they could barely be described as “a touch bright”.

I may be a “solid state guy”, but I am certainly impressed with Rogue (tube) amplification.

In fact, all the equipment was of a very high standard, and certainly not overpriced.

A beautiful system!


Many thanks to Matej from Audio Solutions for presenting this great equipment to us.